Propaganda Cartoon

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Why do people think that the early cinema in the Soviet Union was laced with propaganda towards totalitarianism? In the early 1900’s, the Soviet Union was a very strict nation that was very controlling over what information their people gather from the government and from the rest of the outside world. The leaders of the Soviet Union had to find every way in which they could get out government information in the citizen’s every day lives. At first, the government would use basic newspaper articles to brainwash their minds. The written word was the only media in which the government could get out their specific agenda. Then they needed to step it up and try a new tactic. Radio was another outlet but lacked visual content. Movies had just started being developed and were a great way to get to peoples thoughts and minds because so many people are enthralled with them. The nation’s film industry was mostly nationalized through most of the countries history with philosophies and laws created by the Soviet Communist Party. Because of the depletion of resources from World War I, Russian film schools would take copies of other films and re-cut them with what they call meaning, but is really propaganda. When the new communist rulers took over the nation, they cut off all of the other movies from the outside world to keep people focused and involved with Russia and Russia only. This is because there was a concern that foreign films exposed people to capitalist ideologies. Some western movies depicted the Soviet Union in a negative light. Thus putting these ideas into the minds of the viewers. Soon the Soviet Film Industry stopped relying on foreign technologies. During its industrial effort in the early 1930s, the USSR manufactured factories to supply the nation with its own cinema technologies. This movement gave Russia the opportunity to put what ever they wanted into their films because they do not need to have licenses from the west telling them what they can and can not put in their films, so propaganda was very common. Stalin believed that film would be the best form of propaganda for the Soviet Union because of the mass popularity among the citizens. Stalin even used film to change the nation’s history. If something embarrassing happened with Russia’s history, the filmmakers and producers could easily pretend that none of that ever happened. They would make up their own story and call it history. Sergei Eisenstein made a movie called; Ivan the Terrible Part II and was completed in 1945 but was not released until 1958 due to political censorship. This was 5 years after Stalin's death because Stalin was very strict about what was shown to his people. This movie described Ivan as less of a hero than the people were originally told. After the death of Stalin, Soviet filmmakers were somewhat free to film what they believed audiences would want to see, but the industry still remained part of the government, and any material found politically offensive was either removed, edited, re-shot, or shelved. 513

15 comments:

  1. mike i agree with your point. I just think that people should not be able to put whatever they want in their movies because sometimes it could cause unnecessary problems. And a question how did Stalin use film to change the nations history?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mike I also agree with you, but why did Stalin want to use film to help influence and brainwash society? What if the people had understanding of the outside world's propaganda?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mike I too agree about propaganda, but didn't Stalin also brainwashed the people with speches? What would happen if the media got something wrong about Stalin?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mike I agree too. But I am also wondering how Stalin used film to change the nations history.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mike I beg to differ. I fail to see how simply making a film can change the way the collective masses view history. To change history one must also rewrite/burn/censor books.
    -Jordan Ghahremani

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mike I agree for the most part. But i dont understand how Stalin used film to change the nations history???

    ReplyDelete
  7. why did stalin use film to change history

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mike. I also disagree. Just because Stalin put out films doesn't mean that the population had to watch them. Even if Stalin thought he had total control over his people, they ultimately could make decisions themselves. Movie propaganda only had an effect on those with open ears.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I also agree with Mike. Movies are known to have great influence on the human mind and can lead the mind to believe in false facts, fore instance how scary movies can make one scared of the dark. Of course this would depend on the everyday habbits of the Russian people but even so I believe since cinema was somewhat of a new entertainment to the world that the people would be more interested in what was newest movie rather than the newest book. Making them slowly drift away from books and believing what they were seeing since there is a high chance that people did not understand how films could be altered.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This post is very complete and covers all the topics. I think it's interesting how the propaganda films began through film students re-editing them with their own meaning. I also think that movies definitely have the most effect on an audience and are the most successful way to control/influence a group of people. Although, it is ridiculous how Stalin changed history with the films and censored other directors to keep a strangle hold on his people.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This is very factual and interesting facts about stalin. One thing i find ironic is after Stalin died he was edited out of movies he was in. So I guess his tactics of propaganda continued on.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This post is very great and I think that most of your information is correct. Should people be able to put whatever they want n the magazines and their films? Why is it that the people seem to believe the propaganda? It is very interesting to see how the propaganda helped certain nations get where they are today though. If some nations would have never used propaganda their nation would not be nearly as strong. So propaganda is good and bad in many ways.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I agree with both Mike and Channell. Movies watched during that era when cinematography was newer probably impacted more than someone watching a movie now and realizing the difference between fact or fiction. Stalin's leadership seemed like it would also affect the nation's trust and opinions they had on Stalin.

    ReplyDelete
  14. how do you know stalin didnt use film to protect his people from foreign propaganga. What if he just wanted to controll what is beloved people saw?

    ReplyDelete
  15. How did Soviet propaganda compare with what the Nazis were putting out there, or even the Americans? Is this really as sinister as we think, or is it something all countries do? Channell, if Stalin wanted you to watch a movie, you watched the movie. Remember what happens to those who do not fit in or go along in a totalitarian society.

    ReplyDelete